| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Hockey New England | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 100% |
| 2. Hockey Coffs Coast | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 60% |
| 3. Manning Valley | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 60% |
| 4. Parkes | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 47% |
| 5. Wagga Wagga | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 | 27% |
| 6. Albury Wodonga | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 0 | 0% |
The point score is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
point scores. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.